Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 and Renault Captur have the same engine power, but Peugeot 2008 torque is 30 NM less than Renault Captur. Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 2008 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 17 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`666 | 1`726 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Renault Captur has
| |