Opel Frontera 1996 vs Nissan Terrano 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 287 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 19.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Frontera is more dynamic to drive. Opel Frontera engine produces 14 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Nissan Terrano. Thanks to more power Opel Frontera reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Frontera is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Frontera consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Frontera could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Frontera consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Opel Frontera is 39 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Frontera is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1160 litres | 1900 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Opel Frontera has 185 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. The Nissan Terrano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 740 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Frontera is 0.7 metres less than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Opel Frontera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Opel Frontera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Terrano has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Opel Frontera, so Opel Frontera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Frontera has
|
| |