Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Nissan Patrol 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 168 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 402 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 8 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Nissan Patrol. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 95 litres | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Patrol engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.86 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2226 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |