Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2005

 
Mitsubishi L 200
2006 - 2012
Nissan Navara
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltDouble-row timing chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 168 HP174 HP
Torque: 402 NM403 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.4 seconds
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 6 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Navara.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data8.5
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
930 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Navara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 30 years26 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: no data5.22 m
Width: no data1.85 m
Height: no data1.78 m
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no data13.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`9103`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 86006800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • timing belt engine
Nissan Navara has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv