Chevrolet Colorado 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006

 
Chevrolet Colorado
2004 - 2006
Mitsubishi L 200
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 177 HP136 HP
Torque: 250 NM314 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds14.6 seconds
Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 41 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 64 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.39.5
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Colorado consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
700 km on highway910 km on highway
Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.26 m5.08 m
Width: 1.74 m1.80 m
Height: 1.66 m1.78 m
Chevrolet Colorado is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 645 litresno data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data2`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 84008400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Colorado has
  • more power
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv