Chevrolet Colorado 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 41 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 64 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 9.5 | |
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Colorado consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
700 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.26 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
Chevrolet Colorado is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Colorado has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |