BMW X1 2009 vs Mazda CX-5 2012

 
BMW X1
2009 - 2012
Mazda CX-5
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 177 HP150 HP
Torque: 350 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.2 seconds
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW X1 engine produces 27 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 30 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.84.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km6.9 l/100km
By specification BMW X1 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X1 could require 180 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X1 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1210 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1360 km on highway
910 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

BMW X1 has 4x4: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 17 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.54 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.55 m1.71 m
BMW X1 is smaller.
BMW X1 is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 17 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1350 litres1620 litres
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space.
BMW X1 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 270 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1302`035
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 90009600
Pros and Cons: BMW X1 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Mazda CX-5 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv