Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared cabrios 8 - 14 years old

Most compared sedans 8 - 14 years old Most compared hatchbacks 8 - 14 years old Most compared estate cars 8 - 14 years old Most compared crossovers 8 - 14 years old Most compared cabrios 8 - 14 years old Most compared coupes 8 - 14 years old Most compared minivans 8 - 14 years old
Audi A5 2008 3.2 vs BMW 3 series 2007 3.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Renault Megane 2010 1.5 vs Opel Astra 2007 1.9
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Mazda MX-5 2008 1.8 vs Mazda MX-5 2015 2.0
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Renault Megane 2010 1.4 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011 1.4
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
full specification comparison
BMW Z4 2009 2.5 vs Mercedes SLK 2011 1.8
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    Audi A3 2008 1.8 vs Fiat 500 2010 1.2
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    full specification comparison
    Mazda MX-5 2015 2.0 vs Mercedes SLC 2016 2.0
    • better manoeuvrability
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    full specification comparison
    Mercedes SLK 2011 1.8 vs Mazda MX-5 2015 2.0
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • better manoeuvrability
    full specification comparison
    Mazda MX-5 2008 2.0 vs BMW Z4 2009 2.5
    • lower fuel consumption
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    SAAB 9-3 2010 1.9 vs Audi A5 2008 2.0
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    full specification comparison
    Audi TT 2007 3.2 vs Mercedes SLK 2008 3.5
    • has 4x4 drive
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    full specification comparison
    BMW 6 series 2007 3.0 vs Mercedes SL 2008 3.5
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    full specification comparison
    BMW 3 series 2010 3.0 vs Fiat 500 2010 1.2
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Volkswagen EOS 2011 2.0 vs Volvo C70 2009 2.4
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • more power
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Mercedes SLK 2008 1.8 vs BMW Z4 2009 2.0
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • lower price
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    full specification comparison
    Audi A5 2008 3.0 vs BMW 6 series 2007 3.0
    • lower fuel consumption
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • roomier boot
    • more power
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    full specification comparison
    Audi A5 2008 3.0 vs Volvo C70 2009 2.0
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower fuel consumption
    full specification comparison
    Audi A5 2011 3.0 vs Audi A3 2008 2.0
    • timing chain engine
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • timing belt engine
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    full specification comparison
    Audi A3 2008 1.9 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011 1.4
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    full specification comparison
    Chrysler Sebring 2007 2.7 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006 2.0
    • more power
    • hydraulic power steering
    • lower price
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
    Follow us on Facebook!
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv