Subaru Outback 2003 reviews
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 125`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 310.8 $ (~ 103 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Stable, secure, reliable. Do not require large investments. Easy repairs. Excellent passability. Petrol / gas (with lubrication) 5.6 Eur / 100km.
Cons: Purchasing spare parts (axle-shaft grenades, bearings, etc..) should be aware shops offer alternatives for smaller capacities which do not holds the load.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 70`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 16.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Goes like a beast, perfect handling, can go anywhere you want, for a street car. You know what you're fueling for.
Cons: Be aware that regular maintenance is required for brakes and suspension
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 12 years) | Owned for: | 4`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Safe driving, stability, plenty of space, high suspension, easy travel, transparent surroundings.
Cons: Everybody wants to install in gas system to reduce running costs and thus kills engines.
| Purchase year: | 2010 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Drices where I wanted. I equipped with gas. I was driving for five years on it. Total gas and fuel costs to around 5-6 eur for 100km, depending on legs weight of given moment.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 80`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 16.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 777 $ (~ 155 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 33`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.4 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 4695.3 $ (~ 2347 $ per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very good family car, I bought it precisely because of the good passability (because we often drive with the family to relax in nature), and durable suspension, spacious cabin and very spacious, I enjoyed a comfortable sitting position (I am 182 cm) and an adult could still sit behind me. Powerful and stable on the road, ideal for Latvian weather conditions.
Cons: When I bought it, I got to change the clutch because the flywheel was dead, in principle, in case of such a problem, it is necessary to immediately determine whether there is no free movement in the crankshaft, because in my case I did not do so, which resulted in cracked bearings and knocked out the crank. A new engine had to be put in. Another disease they have with low lights, namely, the reflectors burned out relatively quickly and had to be restored.There are also problems with engine head seals, the specific generation has to follow, because it also ends at 200k km.