Skoda Fabia
Skoda Fabia technical data
Select Skoda Fabia generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Skoda Fabia a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Skoda Fabia is average. The number of defects found on the Skoda Fabia during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Skoda Fabia generation from 2015 to 2018, but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2004 to 2006, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Skoda Fabia. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Skoda Fabia reviews
Total 12 Skoda Fabia owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 2`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Fabia (Rs) very dynamic both on acceleration and braking, stable in turns. Overtaking is not a problem. I doubt 9.6-9.4 seconds to 100 km/n indicated in technical data, I think this car get better. Eats not much fuel. No great extras inside (although it is plus or minus as if it is taken). Nothing in car does not rattle.
Cons: The main minus is little clearance between front tires. The engine is low, so with pan gets down to cracks. I don't know about winter (it frightens). Driving through a gravel roads may be good to hear beating of stones (poor sound insulation). Small mirrors.
| Purchase year: | 2007 (age of car 2 years) | Owned for: | 200`000 kilometers (12 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.5 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Economical small car for unpretentious user. Repairs are based on the parts that are replaced during normal operation. Inspections has been passed by the first time so far. Reliably served on annual European travels.
Cons: Noisy salon. The quality of the paint could have been better.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 155 € (~ 77 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Dynamic with low fuel consumption, in addition, station wagon - quite roomy. Easily and accurately controlled, steady on any surface, good sitting position.
Cons: Seats could be more ergonomical (standard). 3 people in rear seat are cramped. Over 100 km / h engine is loud.
| Purchase year: | 2007 (new car) | Owned for: | 130`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A reliable car. Yes, modest, but do not drains user wallet. Very resistant to our salt, corrode. Mechanics are not difficult to repair, if needed.
Cons: Skoda dealers had to learn to be more attentive to customers.
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 90`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.7 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1380 € (~ 197 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Durable even on dirt roads, easy to park in the city.
Cons: Moisture accumulates on the floor, the floor rusts from the inside, there is a problem with the fuel supply.
| Purchase year: | 2007 (new car) | Owned for: | 200`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.3 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A normal everyday car, quick from a traffic light to other :D. Convenient parking. Cheap operation.
Cons: Rusts after warranty period.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Small, low cost, cheap maintenance, easy maintenance - easy access to everything.
Cons: Rusty