Mitsubishi Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma technical data
Select Mitsubishi Carisma generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Mitsubishi Carisma a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Mitsubishi Carisma is average. The number of defects found on the Mitsubishi Carisma during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Mitsubishi Carisma generation from 1995 to 2003, but overall the reliability scores of all tested Mitsubishi Carisma generations are quite similar.
Most Mitsubishi Carisma are equipped with timing belt engines, which are generally considered less reliable than timing chain engines.
Mitsubishi Carisma reviews
Total 11 Mitsubishi Carisma owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2020 (age of car 23 years) | Owned for: | 12`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 93.24 $ (~ 93 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Rust, never disappointed. Parts are easily accessible, there is enough power around the city. It has successfully moved us thru all mud and snow.
Cons: High consumption, overtaking is difficult. Plastic rattles while driving through the pits
| Purchase year: | 2020 (age of car 24 years) | Owned for: | 23`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 577.2 $ (~ 288 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very robust. Almost like a jeep, you can drive through the woods in peace. Cheap to maintain, never failed, good beater. Very loved and loyal in the meantime.
Cons: Heavy fuel consumption
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 3 years |
|---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Quiet, comfortable, warm, going well.
Cons: Petrol could consume slightly less in winter.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 80`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.7 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 344.1 $ (~ 68 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: For its size fairly economical car.
Cons: An outdated model, relatively few features.
| Purchase year: | 2007 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 9 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Starts without problems anytime, easy going, i am very happy with this car
| Purchase year: | 2005 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 192`000 kilometers (12 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A trusted work car