Latviešu
English
Español
The most reliable used cars
Car mileage calculator
Car costs
Fuel prices
Car videosIf there is no rust and it car is beeing followed up, the car doesn't actually rust, 3 years in a row technicak inspection passed without any remarks. Here and there of course rust bubbles appear now, after our frost winters and age of 13 years.
Low fuel consumption when driving alone with a full tank on a highway cruise 95km / h and 5 speed fuel consumption 4.5l / 100km, full car then 5.5l /...
read all Honda Accord reviews
This generation of Honda Accord has been produced from January, 2001 to February, 2003. We can provide information about 2 modifications of this generation. The car has been produced only with front wheel drive.
This Honda is available with one petrol engine with displacement 1.9 litres and power of 136 HP.
The car is available with both manual (1 version), as well as automatic (1 version) gearbox.
Honda Accord average fuel consumption in combined cycle is from 8.6 to 9.5 litres per 100km. The most economical Honda Accord version is Honda Accord 1.8i, consuming 8.6 litres of petrol per 100km.
Honda Accord CO2 emissions are from 203 to 224 grams per kilometer. Honda Accord version with the lowest CO2 emissions is Honda Accord 1.8i, which produces 203 grams of CO2 per one kilometer.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 11.1 seconds has Honda Accord 1.8i version, conversely the tardiest one is Honda Accord 1.8i reaching this speed only in 12.1 seconds.
Lenght of Honda Accord is 460 cm, it is decent size car. For comparison - Honda Accord is about 2 cm longer than Mazda 626 hatchback, but 3 cm shorter than Toyota Avensis hatchback. Honda Accord gross weight is from 1200 to 1300 kg (depending on modification), which is about 13 percent lighter than the average for this age and class.
This Honda is slightly expensive - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 2000 $. Below you will find more detailed information about Honda Accord prices and costs.
Honda Accord modifications
| Modification | Engine | Power | Fuel cons. | Gearbox |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honda Accord 1.8i Jan 2001 — Feb 2003 | 1.9 Petrol | 136 HP | 8.6 l/100km | Manual (5 gears) |
| Honda Accord 1.8i Jan 2001 — Feb 2003 | 1.9 Petrol | 136 HP | 9.5 l/100km | Automatic (4 gears) |
Honda Accord prices
Honda Accord hatchback price in Latvia is from 1100 $ to 4100 $.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Honda Accord price is very high - Honda Accord is approximately for 44 percents more expensive then average hatchbacks of this age (compare hatchbacks 2001 - 2003 prices). Honda Accord high price can be explained by its quality above average (see below), therefore this Honda could be reasonable purchase in long term perspective.
| Year | Lowest price ($) | Average price ($) | Highest price ($) | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 1800 | 3000 | 4100 | |
| 2002 | 1100 | 1400 | 2000 | |
| 2001 | 1300 | 1600 | 1800 |
Honda Accord total costs of ownership
To calculate the Honda Accord total running costs, including the purchase, insurance, maintenance costs as well as taxes and other costs, click year of production
2001 2002 2003
Honda Accord mileage
To estimate approximate Honda Accord mileage, please choose production year
2001 2002 2003
Honda Accord quality
production year from 2001 to 2003According to yearly reports of German vehicle inspection service (TÜV) Honda Accord quality is good.
During regular inspections failures are found for approximately only 11.2 percents of Honda Accord.
| Year of inspection | Age of car | Failures found % / average for same age cars |
Place in rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda Accord produced in 2003 | |||
| 2015 | 12 years | 30.7% / 32.10% | 29. from 78 |
| 2013 | 10 years | 19.9% / 23.00% | 26. from 87 |
| 2012 | 9 years | 17.9% / 22.20% | 17. from 88 |
| Honda Accord produced in 2002 | |||
| 2013 | 11 years | 23.8% / 27.60% | 17. from 69 |
| 2012 | 10 years | 17.9% / 22.20% | 17. from 88 |
| 2011 | 9 years | 16.2% / 21.40% | 13. from 79 |
| Honda Accord produced in 2001 | |||
| 2013 | 12 years | 23.8% / 27.60% | 17. from 69 |
| 2012 | 11 years | 21.0% / 26.80% | 10. from 77 |
| 2011 | 10 years | 16.2% / 21.40% | 13. from 79 |
Honda Accord hatchback features (options)
Percentage of Honda Accord with corresponding feature (option)
85% Metallic paint
80% Adjustable steering wheel
65% Cruise control
35% Climate control
35% Heated seats
35% Sunroof
20% Rear parking sensors
15% Leather upholstery
10% Rain sensor
10% Electrically adjustable seats
10% Dimming mirrors
5% Navigation
5%
Honda Accord hatchback photo images
Honda Accord reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Honda Accord.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 73`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1098.9 $ (~ 274 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
If there is no rust and it car is beeing followed up, the car doesn't actually rust, 3 years in a row technicak inspection passed without any remarks. Here and there of course rust bubbles appear now, after our frost winters and age of 13 years.
Low fuel consumption when driving alone with a full tank on a highway cruise 95km / h and 5 speed fuel consumption 4.5l / 100km, full car then 5.5l / 100km highway. The average city + highway cycle 6l / 100km is therefore such an average consumption, but mostly it is a little below 6L or as the manufacturer has indicated - 5.8l / 100km.
Quite a spacious car, for two + 8-year-old child calmly lowers the benches, throws a mattress and can comfortably spend the night in the trunk on any summer trip.
High-quality premum audio system with active subwoofer, does not even demand better for everyday use. Rolling keeps Latvian roads very well, in 4 years I have replaced only 2 bushings and 2 stabilizers in rolling stock.
The seat is comfortable, half-leather, I drove from Riga to the LT / PL border without stopping and did not even want to get off. I am 178cm tall, only if you are taller then I could start to be narrow because for me the distance of the seat is standing at the end position. I would say that if it was about 5cm longer, then there could be problems with comfort.
Good and sharp steering.
If you find it rusty then I recommend this model, because it is suitable for both more aggressive driving and family trips.
I have one of the last 7th generation that rolled off the assembly line in Japan (facelift model), but not aux / usb in the original equipment, although the navigation radio has such an output, honda does not offer to buy separately (I requested dealer). I had ordered some Chinese miracle from ebay but sounded miserable, now there is a good BT modulator and I make a living with it.
It could be a bit more powerful, because if there is a full car, then you have to overtake. The turbine satarts to work only from 1800 RPM until then there is no overtaking capacity, so if on a cruise for example on 1200RPM and press accelerator ... it takes some time, but when the turbine turns on then the car goes to the end of the clock. But either the lack of power can't scream terribly and is satisfying on daily trips. Of course there is no ´dragreisist´ with 140hp, but if you are alone, then it also allows you to provoke more aggressively ...
I really don't like ´facelift´ Japanese invention that the DVD card reader is in front of you in the console (before the facelift there were normal shelves.) The DVD card disc puts in well if 1x in life .... I understand if you could watch DVD movies on the navigation screen ... but no! read only the map. It would have been better to have left the shelf and put the reader somewhere in a trivial place.
The sound insulation is not good, when entering the highway during the rain, it seems that the sound passes through the whole can.
The ground clearance could have been at least a couple of cm higher because it is quite low and every now and then when entering the forest I had to look for an alternative path.
As already mentioned, quite thin layer of lacquer and easily scratches, but the body is galvanized and one deeper scratch that has passed under the paint layer, even after 3 LV winters has not turned into a rust stain. That's why everyone who sees honda has rust - guess ... That's not all! There are no more 90s products when honda did not galvanized the body ....
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.2 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 61.05 $ (~ 61 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Well equipped, elastic engine sufficiently dynamic and comfortable car. A responsive and obedient steering response. Sufficiently economic. For family car roomy interior - 5 adults can feel free inside. A good cabin ergonomics. Dependable car - a positive sense, because you can be sure that it will not fail you.
Plan polish / paint coating - easily scraping even when dealing with small branches. Could be better sound insulation - audible road bumps. Interior trim materials become noisy over time - tend to issue a variety of noises. Compared with German analogues less lifting capacity.
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 577.2 $ (~ 192 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Convenient, good-looking, reliable, good drivability - have set up a Eibach springs pro kit, which made driving even more sporty and confortable. 2.0 engine accelerates feom 0 km/h to 100 km/h in 9 seconds, which is much faster, than mentioned in article here.
Regular problems with handbrake (annually), steams up lamps in front. Easy scraping bodywork - varnish soft.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 43`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.4 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 160.95 $ (~ 80 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
I am a fan of this model and there have been in previous year's models. All have served just perfect. Sufficiently comfortable and well-equipped car whose electronics engine as well as rolling part of our roads is just perfect.
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 360.75 $ (~ 360 $ per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Comfortable, spacious, dependable
Boring - its feel not fun to drive; Very large turning radius (manoeuvrability as container ship); Poor visibility in side; Fuel consumption is not as stated;bad sound insulation
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 666 $ (~ 333 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
A very comfortable car, a quiet engine, which works with chain, as well as a dynamic enough for daily city driving.
| Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 300`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 33.3 $ (~ 3 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Very reliable car, proportionate repair costs.
Sound proofing of cabin
| Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 220`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 55.5 $ (~ 5 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Durable running gear
After 10 years use rust appeared on arches. Often front lamps burn out.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 33.3 $ (~ 11 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Very nice car
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 70`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.1 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 32 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 1.8 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 260.85 $ (~ 65 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 120`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 166.5 $ (~ 23 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend