Volvo XC90 2002 vs Saab 9-7X 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Saab 9-7X is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 127 HP less power than Saab 9-7X, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Saab 9-7X. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 13.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Saab 9-7X, which means that by driving the Volvo XC90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 1 cm shorter than the Saab 9-7X, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 1127 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | no data | |
|
Saab 9-7X has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 878 litres less trunk space than the Saab 9-7X. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Saab 9-7X has
| |