Volvo XC90 2019 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Volvo XC90 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 2.7 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 - 407 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
Torque: | 350 - 640 NM | 246 - 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 7.9 seconds | 9.7 - 12.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 10.8 | 7.4 - 11.7 | |
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 621 litres | |
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 253 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`750 | ~ 2`916 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 49 200 | 53 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |