Volvo XC70 2005 vs SAAB 9-3 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC70 engine produces 35 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 80 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Volvo XC70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC70 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC70 could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC70 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC70 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60 | Used also on SAAB 9-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volvo XC70 is larger. Volvo XC70 is 6 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC70 has 66 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.8 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |