Volvo XC70 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Volvo XC70 2002 and Volvo XC70 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo XC70 2002 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC70 2002 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC70 2002 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC70 2002 and Volvo XC70 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | 1641 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
| |