Volvo XC70 2010 vs Subaru Outback 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo XC70
2010 - 2013
Subaru Outback
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo XC70 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Outback can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC70 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.22.0 - 3.6

Performance

Power: 163 - 304 HP150 - 260 HP
Torque: 320 - 440 NM235 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 10.2 seconds7.6 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 10.65.9 - 9.9
Volvo XC70 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback. On average, a Volvo XC70 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Subaru Outback.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.80 m
Width: 1.86 m1.83 m
Height: 1.60 m1.62 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC70 is 4 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 575 litres526 litres
Volvo XC70 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo XC70 has 49 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`377~ 1`979
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 10 20017 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC70 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv