Volvo XC60 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 48 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 is 22 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Volvo XC60 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |