Volvo V70 2013 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 23 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo V70 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Volvo V70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo V70 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V70 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V70 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1680 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo V70 has 86 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |