Volvo V70 2001 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V70 engine produces 46 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 58 NM more than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Volvo V70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.58 m | |
| Volvo V70 and Subaru Outback are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 464 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V70 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |