Volvo V40 2002 vs BMW 3 series 2002

 
Volvo V40
2002 - 2003
BMW 3 series
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP116 HP
Torque: 300 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds11 seconds
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo V40 engine produces 84 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 125 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.97.3
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo V40 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 could require 240 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1120 km on highway
610 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.48 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 and BMW 3 series are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1421 litres1345 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo V40 has 36 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 76 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Volvo V40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8101`930
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
BMW 3 series has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V40, so BMW 3 series quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv