Volvo S80 2011 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S80 engine produces 75 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 489 litres | |
| Volvo S80 has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |