Volvo S80 1999 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 engine produces 74 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 10.0 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S80 consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Volvo S80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1630 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Volvo S80 and Mazda Xedos 9 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
| Volvo S80 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Volvo S80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |