Volvo S80 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S80
2013 - 2016
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 3.02.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 304 HP136 - 306 HP
Torque: 240 - 440 NM320 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 - 12.8 seconds6.9 - 11.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.0 - 9.95.3 - 10.7
Volvo S80 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Volvo S80 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 151 mm (5.9 inches)230 mm (9.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.64 m
Width: 1.87 m1.89 m
Height: 1.49 m1.71 m
Volvo S80 is 21 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S80 is 22 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1455 litres
Despite its longer length, Volvo S80 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Volvo S80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`163~ 2`401
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 11 40016 000
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volvo XC60 has
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv