Volvo S80 2003 vs Volvo V70 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S80
2003 - 2006
Volvo V70
2004 - 2008
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.4 - 2.92.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 130 - 272 HP126 - 300 HP
Torque: 192 - 380 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 - 12 seconds5.9 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 13.06.5 - 13.6
Volvo S80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Volvo S80 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.71 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.49 m
Volvo S80 is larger, but lower.
Volvo S80 is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres485 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1106 litres1641 litres
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo S80 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Volvo S80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 535 litres).
Turning diameter: 13 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`507~ 2`129
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 24002800
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 8.1/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V70 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv