Volvo S80 2003 vs Volvo S80 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 272 HP | 136 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 380 NM | 185 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 12 seconds | 6.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 13.0 | 5.7 - 12.0 | |
|
Volvo S80 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80 2006. On average, Volvo S80 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volvo S80 2003 is smaller. Volvo S80 2003 is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo S80 2006, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S80 2003 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S80 2006 has more luggage space. Volvo S80 2003 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 2003 is 2 metres more than that of the Volvo S80 2006, which means Volvo S80 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`507 | ~ 2`209 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |