Volvo S80 2003 vs BMW 5 series 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S80
2003 - 2006
BMW 5 series
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo S80 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 5 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo S80 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.4 - 2.92.0 - 4.8

Performance

Power: 130 - 272 HP163 - 367 HP
Torque: 192 - 380 NM210 - 560 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 - 12 seconds5.5 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 13.05.9 - 11.0
Volvo S80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Volvo S80 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.84 m
Width: 1.83 m1.85 m
Height: 1.43 m1.47 m
Volvo S80 is smaller.
Volvo S80 is 2 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1106 litres520 litres
Volvo S80 has 80 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 586 litres).
Turning diameter: 13 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 2 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`507~ 2`119
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 24004600
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv