Volvo S80 2003 vs Audi A6 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 272 HP | 130 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 380 NM | 195 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 12 seconds | 6.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 13.0 | 5.7 - 13.0 | |
|
Volvo S80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A6. On average, Volvo S80 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S80 is 2 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1106 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S80 has 111 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Volvo S80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Audi A6, which means Volvo S80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`507 | ~ 2`127 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |