Volvo S60 2013 vs Citroen C4 2016

 
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Citroen C4
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP114 HP
Torque: 400 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds11.4 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 49 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Citroen C4. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.8
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1390 km in combined cycle1250 km in combined cycle
1630 km on highway1420 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.64 m
Width: 1.87 m1.79 m
Height: 1.48 m1.52 m
Volvo S60 is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1749 litresno data
Citroen C4 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4.
Turning diameter: 11.3 metersno data
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1101`795
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 12 2007400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • electric power steering
Citroen C4 has
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv