Volvo S60 2013 vs Volvo V60 2013

 
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Volvo V60
2013 - 2018
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds10.4 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo V60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.87.2
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1170 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1749 litresno data
Volvo V60 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0302`110
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 12 40013 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv