Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo V60 2010

 
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Volvo V60
2010 - 2013
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP163 HP
Torque: 400 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.4 seconds
Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1210 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1520 km on highway
1040 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres430 litres
Volvo V60 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V60.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`090
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 74007400
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo V60 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv