Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo V60 2010

 
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Volvo V60
2010 - 2013
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 249 HP203 HP
Torque: 360 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds8.4 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 46 HP more power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo V60. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.98.3
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres430 litres
Volvo V60 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V60.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0702`140
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 74007400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volvo V60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv