Volvo S60 2002 vs Volvo S60 2004

	Volvo S60 2002 - 2004	Volvo S60 2004 - 2009
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.4 Petrol	2.4 Petrol
Performance
Power:	140 HP	140 HP
Torque:	192 NM	220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	11 seconds	10 seconds
	Volvo S60 2004 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 2002 and Volvo S60 2004 have the same engine power, but Volvo S60 2002 torque is 28 NM less than Volvo S60 2004. Volvo S60 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.2	8.9
Real fuel consumption:	8.7 l/100km	8.7 l/100km
	The Volvo S60 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 2002 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60 2004, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	70 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	850 km in combined cycle	780 km in combined cycle
	1140 km on highway	1010 km on highway
	800 km with real consumption	800 km with real consumption
	Volvo S60 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions
Length:	4.58 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.80 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.43 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 2002 and Volvo S60 2004 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:	424 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1034 litres	1034 litres
Turning diameter:	11 meters	11 meters
Gross weight (kg):	2`020	1`980

Safety:		no data
Quality:	below average	below average
Average price (€):	1600	3200
Rating in user reviews:	8.0/10	8.5/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo S60 has lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage lower price	Volvo S60 has more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo S60 2002 vs Volvo S60 2004

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions