Volvo S60 2013 vs Volvo V60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Volvo V60
2013 - 2018
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 3.01.5 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 304 HP115 - 367 HP
Torque: 220 - 440 NM220 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.9 - 12.3 seconds4.8 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.7 - 9.93.8 - 10.2
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 124 - 136 mm (4.9 - 5.4 inches)136 mm (5.4 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.85 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1749 litresno data
Volvo V60 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters13.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 2.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Volvo S60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`087~ 2`168
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 12 60014 000
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv