Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo V60 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Volvo V60
2010 - 2013
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.6 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 304 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 240 - 440 NM240 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 - 10.9 seconds6.2 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 9.94.5 - 10.2
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres430 litres
Volvo V60 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V60.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`089~ 2`129
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 74007600
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
Volvo V60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv