Volvo S40 2000 vs Volvo S40 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 2000 engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo S40 1996, whereas torque is 117 NM more than Volvo S40 1996. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo S40 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S40 2000 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1996. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2000 and Volvo S40 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.9/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |