Volvo S40 1997 vs Volvo S40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S40 1997 engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo S40 2000, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Volvo S40 2000. Due to the lower power, Volvo S40 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S40 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S40 1997 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 1997 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S40 1997 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1130 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S40 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 1997 and Volvo S40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 6.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |