Volvo S40 1999 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985

 
Volvo S40
1999 - 2000
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1988
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP54 HP
Torque: 190 NM100 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds20.3 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 41 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.3
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S40 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.42 m
Width: 1.72 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.38 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 471 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 6001400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv