Volvo S40 1996 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S40 engine produces 18 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo S40 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo S40 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo V40 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Volvo S40 is larger. Volvo S40 is 12 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S40 has 107 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |