Volvo S40 1996 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985

 
Volvo S40
1996 - 1999
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1986
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP75 HP
Torque: 165 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds13.6 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.68.3
Volvo S40 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.42 m
Width: 1.72 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.38 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 471 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`200
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 6001400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv