Volvo S40 1995 vs Volvo S60 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S40
1995 - 2002
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo S40 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.92.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 200 HP130 - 300 HP
Torque: 143 - 300 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 13 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 10.06.5 - 13.0
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.58 m
Width: 1.72 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Volvo S40 is smaller.
Volvo S40 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres1034 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo S40 has 47 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 181 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo S40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`761~ 2`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 8001400
Rating in user reviews: 6.9/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv