Volvo S40 1995 vs Audi A3 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S40
1995 - 2002
Audi A3
2000 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo S40 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 1.91.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 90 - 200 HP90 - 180 HP
Torque: 143 - 300 NM148 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 13 seconds7.5 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 10.04.9 - 9.3
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.15 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Volvo S40 is 33 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres1120 litres
Volvo S40 has 121 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 267 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`761~ 1`766
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 8001600
Rating in user reviews: 6.9/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv