Volvo S40 1995 vs Ford Focus 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 75 - 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 300 NM | 125 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 13 seconds | 9.3 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 9.7 | 5.4 - 9.4 | |
|
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Volvo S40 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S40 is 12 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo S40 has 19 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. This could mean that the Volvo S40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`756 | ~ 1`669 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |