Volvo S40 1995 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S40
1995 - 2000
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1988
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 1.91.3 - 2.2

Performance

Power: 90 - 200 HP54 - 136 HP
Torque: 143 - 300 NM100 - 184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 13 seconds9.5 - 25.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 9.76.0 - 10.3
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.42 m
Width: 1.72 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.38 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 471 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volvo S40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`756~ 1`267
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 6001400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv