Volvo S40 2004 vs SAAB 9-3 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S40
2004 - 2007
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Volvo S40 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while SAAB 9-3 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.8 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 100 - 220 HP120 - 255 HP
Torque: 150 - 350 NM167 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 12 seconds6.7 - 11.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 10.05.4 - 10.8
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.65 m
Width: 1.77 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Volvo S40 is 18 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 404 litres425 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
883 litresno data
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space.
Volvo S40 has 21 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`928~ 1`581
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 24004000
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 9.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv