Volvo 960 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 960 engine produces 84 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 960 consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 13 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |