Volvo 960 1990 vs Volvo 850 1993

 
Volvo 960
1990 - 1994
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP226 HP
Torque: 280 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.4 seconds
Volvo 960 engine produces 36 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo 850.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.29.4
The Volvo 850 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo 960 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo 850) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 960) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.66 m
Width: 1.75 m1.76 m
Height: 1.41 m1.40 m
Volvo 960 is 21 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 491 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data10.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18001200
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo 850 has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv