Volvo 960 1990 vs Mercedes E class 1989
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
Volvo 960 engine produces 85 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.9 | |
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
Volvo 960 is larger, but lower. Volvo 960 is 9 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 960 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |