Volvo 960 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 20.5 seconds | |
| Volvo 960 engine produces 42 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Opel Omega. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 8 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 1855 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 960 has 467 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |