Volvo 960 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 204 HP | 73 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 280 NM | 138 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.5 seconds | 8.2 - 20.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.2 | 7.2 - 11.3 | |
|
Volvo 960 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. On average, Volvo 960 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 6 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 1855 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 960 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`063 | ~ 2`029 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |