Volvo 850 1996 vs Skoda Fabia 2001

 
Volvo 850
1996 - 1997
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP115 HP
Torque: 290 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.9 seconds
Volvo 850 engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Skoda Fabia.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.67.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Volvo 850 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
1400 km on highway760 km on highway
1100 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m3.96 m
Width: 1.76 m1.65 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Volvo 850 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo 850 is 71 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 850 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 445 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1016 litres
Volvo 850 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 850 has 185 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`625
Safety: no data
Quality:Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Skoda Fabia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv